Skip to main content

Research Scrutinizer Overview

Research Scrutinizer analyzes research documents, expert reports, and scientific literature to identify methodological flaws, statistical weaknesses, and contradictions that can be leveraged in litigation. Our AI examines up to 25 documents simultaneously to provide comprehensive vulnerability assessments tailored to your legal position.

Attorney Perspectives​

Generate analysis from either side of litigation:

  • Plaintiff Attorney: Identify weaknesses in defense research to strengthen plaintiff's position
  • Defense Attorney: Find vulnerabilities in plaintiff's supporting literature to bolster defense arguments

Analysis Focus Areas​

The service evaluates multiple aspects of research quality:

Methodological Analysis​

  • Sample size and selection bias
  • Control group adequacy
  • Confounding variables
  • Study design limitations
  • Data collection methods

Statistical Scrutiny​

  • P-value manipulation
  • Cherry-picked data
  • Inappropriate statistical tests
  • Missing confidence intervals
  • Publication bias indicators

Literature Contradictions​

  • Conflicting findings across studies
  • Outdated research citations
  • Misrepresented conclusions
  • Selective citation patterns
  • Ignored contrary evidence

Author Credibility​

  • Conflicts of interest
  • Industry funding sources
  • Retracted publications
  • Qualification mismatches
  • Bias indicators

What's Included in a Report​

Each research scrutinizer report contains:

  • Executive Summary: High-level weaknesses and strategic recommendations
  • Detailed Vulnerability Analysis: Document-by-document breakdown of identified issues
  • Cross-Reference Matrix: How documents contradict or undermine each other
  • Strategic Questions: Specific challenges to pose during depositions or trial
  • Counter-Arguments: Anticipated responses and suggested rebuttals
  • Strength Assessment: Honest evaluation of which arguments are strongest

File Requirements​

  • Format: PDF documents only
  • Size: Maximum 50MB per file
  • Quantity: 1-25 documents per analysis
  • Content: Research papers, expert reports, medical literature, technical studies

Use Cases​

Research Scrutinizer is particularly valuable for:

  • Challenging expert witness credentials and opinions
  • Undermining opposing party's scientific foundation
  • Preparing for Daubert hearings
  • Identifying admissibility challenges
  • Developing cross-examination strategies
  • Finding alternative explanations for injuries or damages

Best Practices​

  1. Include Complete Documents: Upload full papers, not just abstracts
  2. Provide Context: Use the extra_context field for specific focus areas
  3. Mix Document Types: Include both supporting and opposing research
  4. Consider Both Sides: Analyze your own research to anticipate challenges
  5. Update Regularly: Re-analyze as new research becomes available in the case